SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 189

S.M.JHUNJHUNUWALA
Central Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Elmot Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.M. JUNJHUNUWALA, J.:---The applicants have applied for leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to continue to prosecute the original Suit No. 7 of 1986 and original Suit No. 507 of 1989 filed in the Court of Additional Subordinate Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Saroor Nagar, in Andhra Pradesh.

2. According to the applicants, applicants are secured creditors of respondent No. 1 and the said Suit No. 7 of 1986 filed by the applicants is a mortgage suit and as secured creditors, the applicants are entitled to file proceedings in order to realise mortgage debt and other securities created by the respondents No. 1 in favour of the applicants.

3. The Premier Automobiles Limited had filed a winding up petition against the respondent No. 1, being the Company Petition No. 645 of 1988. By an order dated 23rd June, 1990, the respondent No. 1 was ordered to be wound up an Official Liquidator has been appointed as Liquidator of the respondent No. 1 Company. In view of the said order passed on 23rd June, 1990, the applicants have filed the present application for leave as aforesaid.

4. Mr. Sanghavi, the learned Counsel appearing for the applicants, has submitted that the app







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top