SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 47

S.M.JHUNJHUNUWALA
Harinder Kaur Narender Singh Dhanova & others – Appellant
Versus
Narender Singh Rattansingh Dhanova – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.M. JHUNJHUNUWALA, J.:---In the suit filed by plaintiff and the two minor children for maintenance, these notices of motion have been taken out by the plaintiffs for interim maintenance as prayed for therein.

2. The 1st plaintiff is the wife of the defendant. The 2nd plaintiff and 3rd plaintiff are the minor son and minor daughter respectively of the 1st plaintiff. The marriage between the 1st plaintiff and the defendant was solemnised on 6th February, 1976 as per Sikh religious rites. The parties are governed by Hindu Law.

3. Two sons and two daughters are born out of this wed-lock. The 2nd plaintiff who is the son of about 14 years age, is known as Tinku. The 3rd plaintiff who is a daughter of about 13 years old, is known as Pinki. One Harjinder Singh is a minor son of about 11 years age, is also known as Minku. Gurucharan Kaur is a minor daughter of about 8 years old. She is also known as Dinki. The plaintiffs and the defendant as also the said Harjinder Singh and Gurucharan Kaur resided together from the year 1984 in Flat bearing Nos. 103 and 104 on the 1st floor of the building known as 'Silver Cascade' Mt. Mary Road, Bandra (West), Bombay 400 050. The said Flat No.

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top