SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Bom) 486

A.A.CAZI
Taj Trade & Transport Co. Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
Oil and Natural Gas Commission and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.A. CAZI, J.:---I am passing orders on three suits which are for referring disputes to arbitration and on three petitions which are for interim reliefs in those proceedings. The circumstances giving rise to these proceedings are stated in the following paragraph.

2. It will be noticed from the titles of the suits given above that the parties are the same in all the there suits. However, three different suits have been filed because they arise from three different agreements which are in respect of three different shipping vessels viz. (i) M.V. Ramey Tide, (ii) M.V. Jensen Tide, and (iii) M.V. Mire Tide. Suit No. 347 of 1991 arises from the agreement pertaining to M.V. Ramy Tide, Suit No. 348 of 1991 arises from the agreement pertaining to M.V. Jensen Tide,and Suit No. 349 of 1991 arises from the agreement pertaining to M.V. Mire Tide. These three vessels are foreign vessels which the plaintiffs had chartered from the foreign owners M/s. Tidewaters Marine Service Inc. Foreign vessels cannot be legally plied in Indian Waters without licence from the Director General of Shipping, Government of India. The plaintiffs obtained "Specified Period Licences" in respect of these v





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top