SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 373

M.G.CHAUDHARI
Rajesh Anantram Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - M.G. CHAUDHARI, J.:---When the appeal was placed for admission before me, I found it necessary to call for the record and proceedings and after perusing the same I am of the view that the appeal can be disposed of at this stage itself and need not be kept pending for years. Accordingly I have admitted the appeal. The learned Prosecutor waived notice and by consent the appeal was taken on board and is finally heard. The appellant is also present.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Thane on 29th June, 1992 convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under section 304 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code for which he has been sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years.

3. The incident occurred in somewhat unfortunate circumstances. The appellant is a student and is presently reading for M.Com. examination. At the time of the incident he was a school going boy. Deceased Jaswant Singh Jogendra Singh Ramgadiah as well as the appellant were residents of Camp No. 3, Ulhasnagar. Both of them were working as labourers in the workshop of one Manvirsingh. The houses of both the parties were


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top