SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 1

N.NAIK BHIMRAO
Vithoba Ram Rahane and another – Appellant
Versus
Bhalchandra Sadashiv Joshi and others – Respondent


JUGDMENT - BHIMRAO N. NAIK J. :---This is a petition under Article 227 filed by the tenants challenging the order passed by the Assistant Collector, Junnar Sub Division, Khed on 10th June 1977 whereby their application under section 84 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for the sake of brevity) is rejected. This order passed by the Assistant Collector was confirmed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune in MRT. VIII-4/77 (TNC-B-290/77).

2. Few facts which are relevant for the purpose of this petition are as follows:

One Vithoba Rama Rahane was the tenant of 9 pieces of land, namely ; 721/3, 721/5, 725/3B, 231/2B, 720/1, 721/1, 732/1, 333/2 and 744/2B. The proceedings under section 32G were initiated some time in the year 1962 and on 5th August 1962 the statement of petitioner No. 1 was recorded. He expressed his unwillingness to purchase 5 pieces of land out of 9 pieces of land, being Survey Nos. 720/1, 721/1, 732/1, 333/2 and 744/2B. The order under section 32G and 32P appears to have been passed on the same day, that is, on 5th August 1962. Even the possession of the five pieces of lands mentioned above was taken by th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top