SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 465

M.B.GHODESWAR, H.W.DHABE
Maharashtra Shikshan Sanstha, Nagpur & another – Appellant
Versus
Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nagpur & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DHABE H.D., J.:—The petitioner No. 1 is an Educational Society which runs the petitioner No. 2 School. The petitioners have challenged in the instant Writ Petition the interim order of the learned School Tribunal dated 21-8-1992 by which it has confirmed its ex parte ad interim order directing reinstatement of the respondent No. 2 in Service in his post of Assistant Teacher in the petitioner No. 2 Schools pending decision of the appeal preferred by her before it.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners has urged two contentions before us. The first contention urged before us is that there is no power in the School Tribunal to direct reinstatement of the teacher concerned temporarily pending its final decision in the appeal. The second contention raised before us is that the School Tribunal has at any rate no power to grant by way of interim relief the full relief which it can grant only at the time of final decision in the appeal before it. In support the learned Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of (Cotton Corporation of India v. United Industrial Bank Ltd.)1, A.I.R. 1983 S.C. 1272.

3. It may be seen that the co


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top