M.B.GHODESWAR, H.D.PATEL
Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works & others – Appellant
Versus
Purushottam Sitaramji Khandelwal & others – Respondent
2. The facts relevant for the purpose of deciding the appeal are as follows:
The plaintiff No. 1 carried on the business as wholesale paper merchant under the name and style "Dinesh Paper Mart" being the sole proprietor. The said business is now taken over by the partnership also in the name of "Dinesh Paper Mart" with all its existing assets and liabilities with effect from 1-1-1980. The suit claim being one of the assets of the partnership firm it was joined as plaintiff No. 2. After formation of the partnership the plaintiff No. 1 Purushottam became the partner of the firm. The plaint is signed by plaintiff No. 1 as an individual as well as the partner of the firm.
3. The defendant No. 1 was a registered partnership firm of which the defendants Nos. 2 to 9 were the partners. I
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.