M.L.PENDSE, A.P.SHAH
Ramniklal Ratilal Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Y. A. Sathaye & others – Respondent
2. Before the Competent Authority, it was the contention of the petitioner that the said lands at Mulund and Ghatkopar have no independent means of access from any public road or street and no construction is permissible on the said lands under the Development Control Regulations of Greater Bombay and, therefore, the said lands are excluded from the definition of 'vacant land' by virtue of the provisions of sub-clause (1) of Clause (q) of section 2 of the said Act. It was also contended by the petitioner that there is unauthorised hutment upon the Ghatkopar land and, therefore, it is not a 'vacant land' as define
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.