SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 211

B.V.CHAVAN, H.W.DHABE
Vidya Vikas Khandekar – Appellant
Versus
Bal Mandir Sanstha & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DHABE H.W., J.:---These three writ petitions can be conveniently disposed by this Common Judgment.

2. The petitioners in these writ petitions are the teachers working in the Secondary Schools of the respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 1 runs the Secondary School in Bajaj Nagar, where there are classes from 1st Standard to 10th Standard in English as well as in Marathi Medium. There is also School run by the respondent No. 1 at Neeri in Nagpur where classes from 1st Standard to 10th Standard exclusively in English Medium are conducted. It is the case of the respondent No. 1 that this is not a different School, but the extension of the School in Bajaj Nagar, where there was no adequate accommodation for housing all its classes.

3. Originally, the above Schools of the respondent No. 1 were unaided Schools. It is not in dispute that a teacher appointed in one School cannot be transferred to its another School by the respondent No. 1, when its above Schools were unaided. It is further not in dispute that from the academic-Session 1991-92, one section in VIIth standard class and all the sections in the VIIIth to Xth standard classes in Marathi Medium in the School of the respon






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top