V.S.SIRPURKAR
Principal, Bhartiya Mahavidyalaya & another – Appellant
Versus
Ramkrishna Wasudeo Lahudkar – Respondent
2. The application was opposed by the petitioners on number of grounds. Firstly, it was contended that the college or the institution was not an 'industry' and, therefore, there was no question of the application of the Gratuity Act. Secondly, it was stated that even if it was an industry, the salary of the concerned applicant was more than the prescribed limits and, therefore, the petitioners were not liable to pay the gratuity as prayed for. It was submitted further by the petitioners in defendant that the college was affiliated to Nagpur University, Nagpur and, therefore, the college and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.