SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 148

B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Rama Aziz Parpia and others – Appellant
Versus
Balkrishna K. Mehta and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.N. SRIKRISHNA, J.:---This originating summons has been taken out by some of the legatees under the Will of the deceased Dr. Vithaldas Ladhabhai Parmar (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") for certain directions to the executors of the estate of the deceased.

2. The plaintiffs are the married daughters of the deceased. The first two defendants are the executors of the Will of the deceased. The third defendant is the daughter-in-law of the deceased, being the widow of late Jamnadas Parmar, a son of the deceased. Defendant No. 4 is another son of the deceased.

3. The deceased, Dr. Parmar, was practising as a Surgeon in Bombay and had a large practice. He had his consultation rooms at Laud Mansion, Charni Road, which were taken on tenancy from the owner of the said building. Out of the large income earned by him, with prudent investments, he acquired several properties during his lifetime. The deceased executed a Will dated 9th May, 1974, making provisions for certain pecuniary legacies and for disposal of the residue after payment of the pecuniary legacies. A codicil was also executed on 17th February, 1975, under which, certain specific bequests were made to









































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top