SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 491

S.M.DAUD, M.G.CHAUDHARI
Sureshkumar Sakharchand Shah – Appellant
Versus
Edna Sushila Samuel – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.M. DAUD, J.:---These are cross-appeals arising out of the judgement and decree of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division at Pune vis-a-vis Survey No. 52/6-C admeasuring 1 acre and 32-3/4 gunthas at village Vadgaon Sheri. Taluka Haveli, District Pune, more precisely described in para 1 of the plaint.

2. The appellant in First Appeal No. 285 of 1985, hereinafter referred to as defendant as the owner of the suit land. The appellant in First Appeal No. 249 of 1985, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff is a businessman based at the Pune. Defendant's husband and the plaintiff were clubmates, both being the members of the Pune club. Plaintiff entered into an agreement to purchase the suit land from the defendant and the said agreement was reduced to writing on 19-7-1971 at Exh. 55. Broadly speaking, the plaintiff paid earnest money of Rs. 10,000/- from out of the agreed price of Rs. 1,22,000/-, was to pay the balance within a period of nine months and in return the defendant was to pass a sale deed in plaintiff's favour. The defendant on her part undertook to do various things such as produce documents of title to satisfy PIFF of her right to transfer the land free of enc









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top