SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 584

D.R.DHANUKA
Oil & Natural Gas Commission – Appellant
Versus
Offshore Enterprises Inc – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.R. DHANUKA, J.:---While hearing Arbitration Petition No. 210 of 1989, I found that Shri Atul Munim and Shri Pramod Dalal, Partners of Messrs. Bachubhai Munim Co., a firm of Advocates, had filed their own affidavits as Constituted Attorney of the respondent Messrs. Offshore Enterprises Inc., while Messrs Bachubhai Munim Co., were also on record of the proceedings in their professional capacity as advocates for the respondent, I have come across several such cases where Power of Attorney is obtained by one or other partner of the Advocate's firm/Solicitors' firm from a non-resident client and the Advocates' firm acts for that party in a professional capacity. While delivering my judgment dated 20th and 23rd April 1992, I observed as under :

"In case of foreign clients, a practice appears to have grown up to the effect that the Advocate on record acts both as a Constituted Attorney of the client as well as an advocate on record. Time has reached when it shall have to be considered as to whether this practice is in accordance with law and as to whether an Advocate can be permitted to combine the role of a Constituted Attorney of a suiter and that of an Advocate/Solici










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top