JUDGMENT - A.V. SAVANT, J.:---Heard both the learned Counsel, Dr. Chandrachud for the petitioner employer and Mr. Puri for respondent No.1 - original complainant employee.

2. The petition seeks to challenge the interim order dated 28th July, 1993 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay, granting interim reliefs in terms of para 4(a), (b) and (c) of the complaint filed by the respondent workman. In para 4(a), prayer is for an injunction restraining the petitioner employer from dismissing, discharging or terminating the services of the complainant. In para 4(b), prayer is for a direction not to adversely change the service conditions of the complainant and in para 4(c), prayer is for a direction to the petitioner to withdraw the illegal change permanently and pay the amount lost by the complainant by virtue of illegal change. Since the matter has been argued at length, and since the question of interim relief assumes importance in the peculiar nature of the controversy, it has become necessary to record some reasons for this order.

3. The petitioner is a travel agency. It handles several Airlines. From the letter dated August 19, 1992 submitted by the employees to the petitioner, it app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document