SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 329

V.A.MOHTA
Deoram Tulshiram Patil – Appellant
Versus
Zilla Parishad, Nasik and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - V.A. MOHTA, J.:---Appellant/Original Plaintiff is a contractor. He undertook to make special repairs of 'Taharabad Bandhara' constructed by the respondents/Original defendants - the Zilla Parishad, Nasik. After the work was completed, measurements were taken and final bill for Rs. 2861/- was prepared on 25-3-1970 and was sanctioned on 31-3-1970. But the amount was not paid despite correspondence. Last demand notice was given on 15-5-1970. The Zilla Parishad did not dispute the liability to pay the said amount, but refused to pay saying that the amount was adjusted in the previous arrears due in respect of some other work carried out in the year 1963. Since there was no positive response, ultimately the suit was filed for recovery of a sum of Rs. 2861/- and interest by way of damages.

2. The trial Court decreed the suit holding that there was no justification - legal or factual - for withholding the sanctioned amount. No other point about maintainability of the suit was raised by the defendants either in the written statement or at the time of hearing.

3. The Zilla Parishad appealed against the said judgment and decree. In the Appeal, for the first time, a point was raised




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top