V.A.MOHTA
Deoram Tulshiram Patil – Appellant
Versus
Zilla Parishad, Nasik and others – Respondent
2. The trial Court decreed the suit holding that there was no justification - legal or factual - for withholding the sanctioned amount. No other point about maintainability of the suit was raised by the defendants either in the written statement or at the time of hearing.
3. The Zilla Parishad appealed against the said judgment and decree. In the Appeal, for the first time, a point was raised
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.