SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 387

M.F.SALDANHA
Digambar Hari Sonpatki – Appellant
Versus
Kishnichand Nerumal Parwani – Respondent


JUDGMENT - M.F. SALDANHA, J.:--A curious position has arisen in this case which requires to be resolved in an equally unusual manner. The petitioner before me Digambar Hari Sonpatki is a resident of Barrack No. 1292 at Ulhasnagar. A suit was filed against him by the respondent-Landlord under section 12(3)(a) of the Rent Act on the ground that he is in arrears of payment of rent and that he had not paid up the arrears inspite of service of notice dated 5-11-1974. The suit in question was filed on 10-12-1974. The defendant-tenant defended the proceeding and contended that the rent was excessive etc. The learned trial Judge after hearing the parties dismissed the suit, on the ground that the material before him did not disclose a default under section 12(3)(a) of the Rent Act. The matter was thereafter carried in Appeal by the respondent-Landlord and the Appeal Court set aside the trial Court's order, held that the respondent-tenant was a clear defaulter and decreed the suit against him. Thereafter the tenant approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution by way of the present petition. It is material for me to record that at the stage of admission this Court passed an or














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top