SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(Bom) 347

N.P.CHAPALGAONKER
Ramchandra Keruji Deokar – Appellant
Versus
Raghunath Shankar Bichakar – Respondent


JUDGMENT - N.P. CHAPALGAONKER, J.:---This Civil Revision Application raises a question whether there is any limitation prescribed for an application by a person retiring from the Armed Force for getting premises vacated from the possession of the tenant under section 13-A1 of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, hereinafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as `the Bombay Rent Act. Brief facts of the case are as follows.

2. The landlord Raghunath Shankar Bichkar filed an application under section 13-A1 of the Bombay Rent Act before the Competent Authority at Nasik in which he contended that he is the landlord of House No. 144, City Survey No. 5978 situated at Sangale Lane in Ahmednagar town and defendant non-applicant Ramchandra Deokar is the tenant in occupation of a portion of the said premises. Rent agreed was Rs. 20/- plus Rs. 5/- as light charges per month. The tenant has not paid any rent since 1st January, 1982 (sic), after 22 years of service he would come back and settle down at Ahmednagar. Only two rooms are in his possession now and those will not be sufficient. He has a son of marriageable age and an ailing and aged mother. Therefore, pr























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top