SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 271

SUJATA V.MANOHAR, N.D.VYAS
Chandulal Hathibhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
Champaklal Ambalal Parikh – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Smt. SUJATA MANOHAR, J.:--The appellant and the respondent entered into a Deed of Partnership dated 1-1-1979 under which they agreed to carry on business in yarn and as commission agents in partnership in the firm name and style of M/s. C.H. Shah Co. The partnership, however, is not registered. A recital in the Parthership Deed states that the respondent was a tenant of business premises situate at Room No. 29, 152/2 Narayan Dhuru Street, Bombay 400 003. Clause 5 of the Partnership Deed provides that the partnership business was to be conducted in the said premises. Clause 29 of the Partnership Deed provides that any dispute or question which may arise in connection with the business of the said partnership or any matter connected with it shall, unless decided by mutual agreement by the parties, be referred to arbitration of arbitrators, one to be appointed by each party to the dispute.

2. Since about July, 1981 there were disputes between the parties. According to the respondent, from 20th July, 1981 onwards the Appellant prevented the respondent from entering the said premises. The respondent thereupon gave a notice of dissolution on 1-1-1981. The respondent thereafte





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top