SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 212

M.L.DUDHAT
Ravindranath H. Hiramath – Appellant
Versus
Prashantkumar Buttan – Respondent


JUDGMENT - M.L. DUDHAT, J.:-This civil revision application along with Civil Revision Application Nos. 456 of 1990, 4618 of 1990 and 608 of 1989 are tagged together as there is a common question of law as to the applicability of section 13-A-2 of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

2. The present petitioner has filed this civil revision application against the judgment order, dated May 30, 1992, passed by the Competent Authority, Division Pune, in M.A. No. 5 of 1992. By the aforesaid judgment and order the competent authority dismissed the application filed by the present petitioner on the ground that the competent authority has no jurisdiction to entertain the said application and also on the ground that the petitioner is a tenant-member of the Society and such a tenant-member of the Society is excluded from the ambit of section 13-A-2 of the Bombay Rent Act. The petitioner in this case is a tenant-member of the Tridal Nagar Co-op. Housing Society in respect of flat No. 5 in building No. A-1 which is duly registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner is the member of Arm Force and at the relevant time he was required to go to North East Frontier area whe

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top