SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(Bom) 123

A.A.DESAI, B.U.WAHANE
Vinit @ Baba s/o. Suresh Swami and others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT- B.U. WAHANE, J.:---Criminal Appeal No. 130 of 1989 is preferred by four accused viz., Vinit @ Baba s/o Suresh Swami, Anil s/o Motiram Dhote, Raju @ Mithun s/o Hariram Gahlot and Pramod s/o Motiram Ingale challenging the finding of conviction and sentence for the offences punishable under sections 302 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, alternatively under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under section 148, 307 read with section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, alternatively under section 307 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. A Criminal Appeal No. 218 of 1989 is preferred by the State against the acquittal of accused viz. Gopal Maharaj s/o Nandlal Upadhyaya, Ramkishore Ramjatan Yadao, Ravindra s/o Bhimrao Kalbande and Ramprasad son of Ramjatan Yadao, for the offences punishable under sections 302 read with 109, 149, 107 and 150 of the Indian Penal Code, and also for the offences punishable under sections 148, 307 read with sections 149, 107 and 150 of the Indian Penal Code. Similarly, the State preferred the Criminal Appeal No. 217 of 1989 for enhancement of punishment of the four accused against whom the conviction


























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top