SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 316

VISHNU SAHAI
Kisan Bhanudas Kumbhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---The appellant aggrieved by the order dated 9-11-1987, passed by the IIIrd Additional Session Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No. 289 of 1986, convicting and sentencing him to undergo five R.I. and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and 6 month R.I. in default, under section 304 Part II I.P.C., has come up in appeal before me. Along with the appellant, six other persons namely (1) Bhanudas Sopan Kumbhar (2) Vishwanath Sopan Kumbhar (3) Machindra Narhari Kumbhar (4) Prakhakar Vishwanath Kumbhar (5) Uttam Duryodhan Kumbhar and (6) Vasant Machindra Kumbhar were tried but, they have been acquitted by the aforesaid order.

2. The prosecution case in brief is as under :

The informant Batu alias Krishna Laxman Kumbhar P.W. 4 was the brother-in-law of the deceased Murlidhar Kumbhar. The latter was the brother of hte wife of the informant and used to reside with the informant. In the land of the deceased, there was a well situate at a distance of about 200 feet from the informants house. That well was jointly shared by the deceased, co-accused Bhanudas (father of the appellant) and some others.

On 8-5-1986, at about 4.00 p.m. when the deceased Murlidhar and his servant Navn























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top