SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 228

D.R.DHANUKA
R. S. Deboo, since deceased by his heirs and others – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Hindlekar and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.R. DHANUKA, J.:—This appeal is preferred by original defendant against decree dated 28th September, 1977 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay in Suit No. 9048 of 1975. By the said decree, the trial Court directed the defendant to pay a sum of Rs. 3,560/- together with interest thereon at the rate of of 6% per annum from the date of the decree till payment and cost of the suit.

1A. The Court in informed by the learned Counsel on both sides that in view of the death of the appellant and original respondent No. 2 the heirs and legal representatives of the appellant as well as original respondent No. 2 have been brought on record of this appeal.

2. This appeal involves consideration of interesting questions of law as indicated in the later part of this judgment. The questions of law arising in this appeal are also of public importance to some extent. For the sake of brevity, the parties to the appeal are hereinafter referred to as the defendants and the plaintiffs. The basic question arising in this appeal concerns interpretation, applicability and legality of a printed condition on the reverse of "laundary receipts" issued by the proprietor of the laundary purp



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top