R.M.LODHA
Ramrathibai wd/o. Sivnath Pardeshi – Appellant
Versus
Surajpal s/o. Bhulai Chaudhari and others – Respondent
2. The important question involved in the present revision application is whether an application filed by the applicant under section 54 of the C.P.C. on 15-2-1992 for sending the precept to the Collector having jurisdiction over the subject-matter for partition of agricultural land i.e. estate assessed to land revenue to Government, pursuant to the decree passed on 9-1-1947, was an application for execution of the decree, and therefore, barred by limitation under Article 182 of the Limitation Act, 1908 or under any article of Limitation Act, 1963 or under section 48 of the C.P.C., as was existing prior to 1-1-1964.
3. The facts are undisputed and the said facts are that the present applicant filed a suit for partition and separate possession against Bhulai Ramdin Pardeshi - the predecessor-in-title of non-applicant Nos. 1 to 15, relating to agricultural lands situated at Mouza Muradabad and Fatepur, tahsil and district Yavatm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.