V.S.SIRPURKAR
Rambhau s/o. Bapurao Deshmukh – Appellant
Versus
Narayan s/o. Sitaramji Ukande and others – Respondent
2. Originally, a civil suit came to be filed by 4 plaintiffs, who claimed that they had purchased the suit house from one Jagdishchandra. It was their contention that all the plaintiffs had jointly purchased the suit house by a sale-deed dated 18-12-1981. They contended that defendant Rambhau was occupying a portion of the said house as a tenant on monthly rent of Rs. 150/-. It was their case that Rambhau who was occupying a portion of the suit house had paid rent for only one month to them after he was informed about the change in ownership and that was for the month of January, 1981. They claimed that thereafter the tenant did not pay rent and had fallen in arrears of the same. A decree for Rs. 1,100/- on that count was claimed in the suit. Originally suit was for ejectment, damages and notice charges. However, subsequen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.