SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 448

V.A.MOHTA, V.P.TIPNIS, A.M.BHATTACHARJEE
Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.M. BHATTACHARJEE, C.J.:---The order of reference which has occasioned the constitution of this Full Bench has been passed by Mohta, J., sitting with Bahuguna, J., and the three questions which have been referred to for the consideration of this Full Bench are as under:-

(1) Has the specially empowered officer under the COFEPOSA Act also an independent power to revoke the order of detention in view of section 11 of the COFEPOSA Act read with section 21 of the General Clauses Act?

(2) Are observations in (Amir Shad Khan v. L. Hminglana)1, A.I.R. 1991 S.C. 1983, regarding power of revocation of specially empowered officer under the COFEPOSA Act not binding on this Court?

(3) Does failure to take independent decision on revocation of order of detention by the specially empowered officer under the COFEPOSA Act and merely forwarding the same with recommendation to reject, result in non-compliance with constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

2. We have heard very interesting arguments advanced by Mr. Karmali for the petitioner, by Mr. Agrawal for the Union of India and by Mrs. Ranjana Desai for the State of Maharashtra and while we have derived considera


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top