SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 486

M.L.PENDSE, N.D.VYAS
Maharashtra General Kamgar Union – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra through Secretary and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - M.L. PENDSE, J. :- Appeal admitted. Shri Dixit on behalf of the State Government and Shri Bhatt on behalf of respondent No. 2 waive service. By consent, appeal taken on board and called out for hearing. Heard Counsel.

2. The question which falls for determination in this appeal is about the exercise of powers of review under sub-section (5) of section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The facts which gave rise to the dispute are not controverted and are required to be briefly set out to appreciate the grievance of the appellants.

M/s. Vazir Glass Work Ltd. - respondent No. 2 is an undertaking which has a factory at Andheri, Bombay and which employed about 750 workmen. On August 14, 1992 the Company filed an application before the State Government seeking permission to close the undertaking with effect from November 16, 1992 in accordance with provisions of section 25-O of the Act read with Rule 82-B of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957. Section 25-O of the Act sets out the procedure for closing down undertaking and sub-section (1) requires employer who intends to close down an undertaking to apply for prior permission, at least 90 days before the date











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top