SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 346

A.V.SAVANT
Cawas Dhunjishaw Saher – Appellant
Versus
Keikobad C. Batliwala – Respondent


JUDGMENT- A.V. SAVANT, J.:---These two petitions can be disposed of together since they relate to the same premises and are between the same parties excepting that in Writ Petition No. 356 of 1994, the landlord H.H. Sardar Sayedina Dr. Mohamed Burhanuddin Saheb is also made respondent No. 2 but he is obviously a formal party. The main contest is between the petitioner and respondent No. 1 in both the petitions.

2.   The premises consist of bedroom No. 1 with an attached bath and W.C. in a flat of approximately 3000 sq.ft. on the second floor of the building known as "Merwan Mansion" situated at Nepean Sea Road, Bombay. The petitioner in both the petitions is Cawas Dhunjishaw Saher, who will be, hereafter, referred to as "Cawas Saher". The first respondent is Dr. Keikobad C. Batliwala who will, hereafter, be referred to as "Keikobad". Respondent Keikobad is the son of the original tenant Cawas Shaw Batliwala and the petitioner Cawas Saher is the son of the sister of Keikobad, viz., Aloo Seher as will be evident from the genealogy given below.

Original tenant Cawasshaw Batliwala

(tenant from 1935 died on 1-5-1943)

"

"

"

Wife - Meherbai (died on 6-12-1960)

| |

Son Keikobad Batliwala Daug























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top