SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 341

A.D.MANE
Dnyandeo Ranganath Aaher – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.D. MANE, J. :---This is an appeal filed by the accused challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned Special Judge, Ahmednagar, convicting him under section 161 of Indian Penal Code and also under sections 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short, the Act) amd sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default, further to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months as a substantive sentences.

2. The main accusation levelled against the accused has been founded on the following allegation. The complainant - Gopinath, as a representative of his family members, obtained an extract of record of rights of the land bearing Gut Nos. 101, 104, 111 and 251 of village Kanoli, Tq. Sangamner, District Ahmednagar on 9-7-1988. He found that bogus names of five persons were shown in other rights column in record of rights in respect of the said lands. He, therefore, requested the accused, who at the relevant time was working as village Talathi, for deleting all those names from the record of rights. The accused is said to have advised him that he should first make an application to the Tah














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top