A.C.AGARWAL, A.S.VENKATACHALA MOORTHY
Najama w/o. Nizamuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent
2. Though several grounds have been advanced for the purpose of impugning the detention of the detenu, it is enough to mention only one of them, as, according to us, the same is sufficient for the disposal of the petition.
3. It is contended that the seizure on the basis of which the impugned order of detention has been issued against the detenu was effected on 14th May, 1991. The detenu was apprehended on the 15th May, 1991 and was released on bail on the 16th May, 1991. The impugned order of detention was belatedly issued on the 18th of November, 1991. The same was bel
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.