SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 312

S.N.VARIAVA
Hemendra V. Shah – Appellant
Versus
Stock Exchange, Bombay and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.N. VARIAVA, J. :---This petition is filed for a declaration that there is no valid and subsisting or binding Arbitration Agreement between the petitioner and the 6th respondent. A declaration is sought that the 3rd respondent is not entitled to fill in the vacancy caused by resignation of one Mr. G.B. Desai and that the purported appointment of one Mr. J.B. Bhatt is illegal, invalid, inoperative and of no effect. A further declaration is sought that the Award, if any, passed would be illegal and invalid.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that the petitioner was the clerk of the 6th respondent. The 6th respondents was a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The petitioner applied for Membership in the year 1988. It is claimed that the 6th respondent gave his no-objection and also stood as a Guarantor. On 13th April, 1989, the petitioner was enrolled as a Member.

3. The 6th respondent claimed that the petitioner was the Proprietor of one R. Dalal Co. The 6th respondent filed before the Bombay Stock Exchange a claim in a sum of Rs. 2.18 crores against the petitioner. The claim was in respect of transactions in A Group Shares during the period 5th November, 1986 to 18th April



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top