SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 214

R.G.VAIDYANATHA
S. M. Dubash, Chairman, Indian Lead Pvt. Ltd. . – Appellant
Versus
V. M. Bhosale, Air Pollution Control Officer of Maharashtra Pollution Control Board – Respondent


JUDGEMENT - R.G. VAIDYANATHA, J.:---This is a petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. and under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the issue of process against the petitioners in Criminal Case No. 307 of 1988 on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane. Heard both the sides.

2. The first respondent-complaint filed a complaint against the third respondent and the petitioners for offences under the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The allegation of the complainant is that the accused No. 1 (respondent No. 3) is a company and accused Nos. 2 to 5, the present petitioners are the Chairman, Managing Director, Director and Factory Manager of the said company. That the company is having a factory where it is using lead press, lead oxide, etc. as raw materials. That the accused have failed to provide suitable arrangements to protect emission to satisfy standards prescribed under the Act and the rules. Hence it is alleged that the accused have violated many of the provisions of the Act and the rules and thereby they have committed an offence punishable under section 39 of the Act.

3. The accused Nos. 2 to 4 challenged the issue of process before the le

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top