SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 26

B.P.SARAF
Mansharam Mirchumal Sangtani – Appellant
Versus
Dhule Nagar Palika (Municipal Council), Dhule – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Dr. SARAF B.P., J.:— All these 73 Writ Petitions are directed against the common judgment and order of the IIIrd Additional District Judge, Dhule, dated 27th August, 1990, setting aside the order, dated 7 March, 1987, passed by the trial Court Judge, granting temporary injunction in favour of the petitioner.

2. The facts of the case, briefly stated are as under :

All the 73 writ petitioners are possessing tenements belonging to the Municipal Council, Dhule. These tenements are used for carrying on petty business. According to the petitioners, they are in possession of those tenements and are carrying on the business there for the last 20 years. The petitioners also contend that they have got licence from the Municipal Council, Dhule under the Shops and Establishments Act for carrying on their business in the tenements in question. It is also submitted that they are paying taxes to the Municipal Council from time to time. The petitioners had also obtained loans from banks for their business. On 1st March, 1987, some officers of the Municipal Council, Dhule along with a number of workers having come to the premises of the petitioners for demolition of the same on the groun




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top