SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 191

R.M.LODHA
Girish Manohar Wazalwar – Appellant
Versus
Purushottam Parasram Kotangale – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. Lodha, J.:---Group of all these civil revision applications arise out of the common order dated 29-10-1994 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, in six separate suits deciding the preliminary issue regarding jurisdiction and since common questions are involved in all these six civil revision applications, these revision applications have been heard together and are disposed of by the common order.

2. The Nagpur Improvement Trust (for short 'N.I.T.') issued the notice under section 286(2) of the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948 (for short 'the Corporation Act') read with section 52 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act (for short 'the N.I.T. Act') to Girish Manohar Wazalwar (owner of the property and applicant in all the revision applications), Shri Hokchand Rupchand Jankalyani, Shri Purshottam Parasram Kotangale (tenant and non-applicant No. 1 in C.R.A. No. 1362/94), Shri Dulichand Shriram Dhawariya (tenant and non-applicant No. 1 in C.R.A. No. 1363/94), Shri Keshanand Tanumal Chawlani (tenant and non-applicant No. 1 in C.R.A. No. 1364/94), Shri Benzamin Anthony Carlo (tenant and non-applicant No. 1 in C.R.A. No. 1365/94), Shri Chetan Rupcha


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top