SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 448

N.P.CHAPALGAONKER
Kutubunisa Begum w/o Mahemood Ur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Bilquees Jahan Begum w/o Mohd. Azizuddin Siddiqui – Respondent


JUDGMENT - N.P. CHAPALGAONKER, J. :--Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent.

2. The learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Aurangabad took the view that an appeal under section 26-A of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1984 would be maintainable only against the final disposal of the suit and not against any interim order and was pleased to dismiss the appeal as not maintainable, vide his judgment and decree dated 24-8-1995. This Civil Revision Application challenges this decree passed by the learned 2nd Additional District Judge, Aurangabad.

3. Chapter IV-A1 was inserted by Maharashtra Act No. XXIV of 1984, by which Small Cause Courts were invested with the powers to deal with certain class of suits between the licensor and licensee or landlord and tenant relating to recovery of possession of any immovable property, irrespective of the value of the subject matter of such suits or proceedings. The whole Chapter IV-A deals with the class of suits mentioned in section 26.

4. Section 24 is a general provision regarding all kinds of small cause suits, which provides:--

"If there is any order under Clause (ff) and (h) of sub-section (1) of section 104 of the Code of Civil Proc










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top