VISHNU SAHAI, R.G.VAIDYANATHA
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Bhuvanendra Mallapa Akiwate – Respondent
2. Briefly stated the prosecution case is as under. The informant Manikchand Bishikar P.W. 1 was the Director and Secretary of the Bahubali Vidyapeeth and Bahubali Bharamcharayashram Kumbhoj, Taluka Hatkanangale.
The respondent at the time of the incident, in fact since 8 years prior to it, was working as clerk in the aforesaid institution. It is also said that the respondent was working as a clerk in Bharat Varashiya Digambar Jain Thirth Kshetra Committee, Head Office at Bombay with branch office at Kumbhoj from two years prior to the incident. It is further said that the respondent used to collect amount from the donors of the institution. The case for the prosecution is that in between the period 27-7-1982 to 7-2-1983, the respondent collected in all a sum of Rs. 9, 341/- but did not deposit the same. Hence, the informant filed a complaint Exh. 19 at police station Chavadi.
3. On the basis of the complaint
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.