1996 Supreme(Bom) 157
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Vishnu Sahai R.G. Vaidyanatha, JJ.
Narayan Pandhari Bhalshankar.... Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 401 of 1993, decided on 14-3-1996.
Advocates appeared :
Sunil Kadam, for appellant.
R.Y. Mirza, A.P.P. for State.
Headnote:Section 374-Evidence Act, 1872-Sectlons 3 and 32-Indlan Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-Dying declaration-It Inspires confidence if seen on conjunction with two other declarations.
Sections 3, 32 and 45-See Indian Penal Code, 1860-Seclion 302.
Sections 3 and 32-See Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302.
Section 3 and 32-See Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Section 374.
Section 32-F.I.R.-Deceased must be conscious at time of making of-Such F.I.R. could be relied on-Making or plying declaration in form of F.I.R. by victim cannot be equated with a saying declaration In the form of statement recorded under Section 161, Cr. P.C.-Where deceased stating that she was burnt by her father-In-law, no capital could be made out from this discrepancy in description particularly when there was corroboration available from two other dying declarations by her.
Section 302-Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 3 and 32-Dying declaration-Inspiring confidence-Conviction of accused can be based on.
Section 302-Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 3, 32 and 45-Doctors evidence-Evidence that he had examined deceased lady on both occasions before recording dying declaration and found her in fit mental condition showing the contention that certificate from the doctor that she was in fit mental condition to give dying declaration was a must is devoid of merit.
Along with the appellant his nephew Ramesh Mohan Bhalshankar was also tried and prosecuted under section 302 read with 34 I.P.C., but he has been acquitted vide the impugned judgment. The State of Maharashtra has not preferred any appeal challenging his acquittal.
2. The prosecution case in brief is that the appellant is the real uncle (father's brother) of acquitted accused Ramesh Mohan Bhalshankar. The deceased Bhamabai was the wife of acquitted accused Ramesh. About 1½ months prior to the incident a quarrel took place between acquitted accused Ramesh and the appellant. During the course of the same the latter assaulted the former with an iron bar resulting in the leg of the former getting fractured. It appears that since the parties were close relations the matter was not reported to the police but a compromise in terms, that the appellant would give the acquitted accused and the deceased food grains and money, was arrived at between the parties. It is said that once or twice the appellant gave food grains and some money to the acquitted accused but thereafter stopped.
On 27-6-1992 at about 7 p.m. the deceased Bhamabai went to the house of the appellant, who stayed in the neighbourhood, and asked him to give money and food grains. On that the appellant replied that he himself was not possessed of sufficient means and therefore could not provide them. Bhamabai's husband, Ramesh on learning this assaulted her and taunted her saying that because of her Narayan had broken his leg. As her husband had assaulted her, Bhamabai at about 9.30 p.m., the same day went to Narayan's house and told him that because of his refusal to provide money and foodgrains her husband had assaulted her.
It is further alleged by the prosecution that some times between 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. on 27-6-1992 the appellant came inside the house of the deceased Bhamabai and after pouring kerosene oil from a bottle on her person set her on fire with the help of a burning match-stick. On hearing her shouts her husband Ramesh tried to extinguish the fire. After the fire was extinguished Bhamabai's brother Gunyaba Sankat immediately took her to the Sassoon Hospital where she was admitted. In the hospital Bhamabai informed her brother that the appellant had poured kerosene oil on her and set her on fire.
Bhamabai was admitted at about mid-night, on the night of 27/28-6-1992, in the Sassoon Hospital, Pune. P.W. 2 Dr. Malviya, a resident medical officer, enquired from her the history of her burns and she informed him that she was burned by her father-in-law who poured kerosene oil on her head and ignited her with a match-stick.
At the time of recording the case-history Dr. Malviya found Bhamabai to be fully conscious and in a fit condition to give her statement. The case history was recorded by Dr. Malviya in the medical case papers at Exhibit 12.
On examining Bhamabai Dr. Malviya found that she had sustained 60% burns which were distributed between her chest, both upper limbs and lower part of face.
Sensing that the condition of Bhamabai was precarious Dr. Malviya informed the Medical Officer, the Superintendent and the police to make arrangement for recording her dying declaration. He had also given her all the necessary emergency drugs.
3. P.S.O. of Band Garden Police Station sent a letter to the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Suresh Wadkar P.W. 4 which was received by the latter at 5.45 a.m. on 28-6-1992, requesting him to record the dying declaration of Bhamabai in Sasson Hospital, Pune. On receiving the aforesaid letter P.W. 4 Suresh Wadkar went to Sassoon Hospital, Pune where in Ward No. 27 he met Dr. Malviya who was on duty. Suresh Wadkar asked the police constable who accompa