SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 216

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
K.G. Shah A.S.V. Moorthy, JJ.
Bhupal Anna Vibhute.... Petitioner.
Versus
Collector of Kolhapur and others.... Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 2294 of 1985, decided on 17-4-1996.
Advocates appeared :
M.A. Rane, for the petitioner.
C.J. Sawant, A.G. with N.B. Shah N.M. Zambre, A.G.P., for respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal, for respondent No. 3.

Headnote:Article 226-Public Interest litigation-Petitioner tax payer closely connected and directly interested in proper administration -Entitled to See-State behaves in a manner warranted by Constitution-Allotment of Government land-Order passed by Collector quashed-Allotment of land in favour of Respondent No. 3 set aside-Respondent No. 3 shall hand over possession of land to respondent No. 1 and 2.

       Section 40 and Constitution of India. Article 14-Public auction to grant Government land for Motor Mechanical Centre-Fixation of upset price-Direction by Collector Earlier decision stayed by Government and after lapse of time allotment by Government without auctlon-l/2 market value-Allotment of land by Revenue Minister with grantee-Advice of secretary denied by Minister-Plea of good knowledge of Motor Mechanism being young man-No special case made out In favour of grantee-Grant of land Illegal arbitrary and set aside.-State has to dispose of its property, the normal rule is that it should be disposed of by public auction, That would bring in the highest revenue, Exception could be made if some directive principle contained in Part IV of the Constitution is sought to be achieved.

       State Government had acted quite contrary to its obligation to protect the public interest. The Ministers were not dealing with their personal property, which they could have given away for song to whom they like,

JUDGMENT

K.G. SHAH, J. :---The petitioner is a citizen of India and is resident of Jaisingpur in Taluka Shirol, District Kolhapur and is a tax payer and is in service at Jaisingpur. The petitioner has come to this Court by way of a public interest litigation by filing this petition wherein he has challenged the order of the State of Maharashtra (respondent No. 2 herein) passed on 6th November, 1984 (Annexure B to the petition) whereby respondent No. 2 has cancelled its earlier order dated 30th September, 1983 and has ordered to allot Government land admeasuring 1115.4 sq.meters bearing C.T.S. Nos. 2256 and 2257 situated at Jaisingpur to Raosaheb Dhanpal Patil (respondent No. 3 herein) as a special case for Motor Mechanical Servicing Centre without auction for Rs. 78,078/- as occupancy price. This order has been passed by respondent No. 2 under section 40 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (for short "the Code"). This order, as said above, is under challenge in this petition. The petitioner has also challenged the consequential order passed by the Collector, Kolhapur (respondent No. 1 herein) on 3rd January, 1985 wherein certain terms and conditions of the allotment of the land have been specified. These orders are challenged as arbitrary and in violation of the Rules pertaining to the disposal of Government lands and thus the orders are alleged to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

2. Later on, the petitioner by amending the petition has also challenged the vires of sections 20, 31 and 40 of the Code. We may mention here that at the hearing Mr. Rane, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, confined the challenge to the vires only in respect of section 40 of the Code.

3. The facts of the case insofar as they are relevant for the present judgment may be stated as follows.

4. Around 11th October, 1981 respondent No. 3 made an application to the Collector, Kolhapur for the grant of land bearing C.T.S. Nos. 2256 and 2257 admeasuring 1115.4 sq.meter situated at Jaisingpur (to be referred to hereinafter as "this land") for starting a Motor Mechanical Servicing Centre. On that application, the Assistant Director of Town Planning made valuation of the land at Rs. 55/- per sq. meter. That was so done in December 1981. On 22nd May, 1982 one Sagarmal Laxmichand Choradia also applied to the Collector for the grant of this land for starting a tobacco shop. The Collector, Kolhapur processed the application of respondent No. 3 as also of Choradia and reported the matter to the State Government under his letter dated 4th July, 1983 recommending the case of respondent No. 3 for the grant of this land to him. However, respondent No. 2 (State of Maharashtra) on 30th September, 1983, disagreeing with the proposal made by the Collector, Kolhapur, took a decision and directed that this land should be disposed of by auction after fixing the upset price with reference to the current market value to be got determined by the Assistant Director of Town Planning. That order of State Government is at Annexure-A to the petition. That order needs to be reproduced in extenso. It reads as follows:

"No. LND-3883/30940-G8

Revenue Forests Dept.

Mantralaya, Bombay-400 032.

Dated 30th September, 1983.

Sub : Lands Kolhapur.

CTS No. 2256 and 2257 of Jaisingpur allotment to Shri Raosaheb Dhanpal Patil for location of Motor Mechanical Service Centre.

Reference your letter No. Desk III R.R.C. 1446, dated 4-7-1983 on the above subject.

2. In this case the applicants have demanded the land in question for commercial purpose. Hence the disposal of the land in question has to be by public auction. In this case, Government has, therefore, taken a decision that the land in question should be disposed of by public auction after fixing the upset price with reference to the current market value to be got determined from the A.D.T.P. I am therefore directed to request you to take further action in the matter accordingly.

3. The request of Sarvashri Raosaheb Dhanpal Pat



































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top