SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 409

VISHNU SAHAI
R. N. Kakkar – Appellant
Versus
Hanif Gafoor Naviwala and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with sections 391, 400 and 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing orders dated 1-8-1995 (Exhibit 72) and 2-8-1995 (Exhibit 73) passed by the Special Judge, under the N.D.P.S. Act for Greater Bombay, in N.D.P.S. Special Case No. 1249 of 1988.

2. A narration of the facts in brief would be necessary for the disposal of this petition.

The respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are being prosecuted for offences punishable under the N.D.P.S. Act and section 135 of the Customs Act. A seizure of heroin, which took place on 22-1-1988 and 23-1-1988, which is said to have been imported into India, by the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 along with an associate of theirs, who is absconding, is said to have given rise to their prosecution.

3. Following facts are not disputed by the counsel for the parties :---

(a) trial in the instant case has been expedited by orders of this Court ; and

(b) applications on which impugned orders were passed were made by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence in which the petitioner is employed, after the closure of evidence of parties, recording of



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top