SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 315

S.M.JHUNJHUNUWALA, S.N.VARIAVA
Yoginath Damodhar Bagde – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.M. JHUNJHUNUWALA, J.:---By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to quash and set aside the order dated 8th November, 1993 by which the petitioner has been dismissed from service. The petitioner also seeks to quash and set aside the Charge-sheet dated 22nd May, 1992 and dissenting findings of the Disciplinary Committee of this Court. The petitioner also seeks reinstatement in service with full back wages and continuity of service and other ancillary benefits such as seniority, permission, increments, etc.

2. The petitioner was working as Additional District Sessions Judge, Amravati when he was served with an order of dismissal from service on 8th November, 1993. The said order was passed as a result of Departmental Inquiry held against the petitioner on the charges that while working as IInd Additional Sessions Judge at Wardha, the petitioner demanded Rs. 10,000/- from one Deepak Trimbakrao Deshmukh, accused in Session Trial No. 28 of 1982 and 37 of 1987 then pending before the petitioner, as a consideration for his acquittal and that the petitioner indulged in corrupt malpractice amounting to gross miscondu



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top