SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Bom) 109

T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS
Anil Shet Gaonkar – Appellant
Versus
Abdulla Khan Karol and another – Respondent


JUDGEMENT - T.K. CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS, J. :---Admit. By consent heard forthwith.

2. The petitioner who is the accused in Criminal Case No. 63/P/1991 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Sattari has filed this petition under section 397 of Cr.P.C.

3. The petitioner on receipt of summons from the Magistrate filed a petition requesting the Magistrate to discharge him from the case mentioned above. The Magistrate refused his prayer by his Order dated 7-12-1994. Against that order the petitioner approached this Court by filing this revision petition.

4. The facts of the case in short is as follows :---

The petitioner is a Range Forest Officer at Sattari at the relevant time. He had to book a case against the first respondent along with eight other persons suspecting them to have committed some offences under the Indian Forest Act. In the process of the investigation of that forest case the petitioner had to call the respondent to his office on 14-9-1991 at 10.30 a.m. and arrested him and released him after necessary interrogation on bail at 10.00 a.m. on the next day. The first respondent thereupon filed a complaint under section 200 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner alleging that the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top