SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 668

S.C.AGRAWAL, T.K.CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS, V.K.BARDE
Sudesh Prabhakar Volvoikar – Appellant
Versus
Gopal Baboo Savoikar – Respondent


JUDGEMENT - T.K. CHANDRASHEKHARA DAS, J. :---Admit. To be heard forthwith by consent.

2. The defendant files this appeal. The suit is for recovery of money from the appellant.

3. The plaintiff's case is that he was employed as a Manager of Cine Metropole at Margao under the Management of M/s. Hira Film Exhibitors. The defendant/appellant was working as a booking-clerk in the said theatre. The plaintiff/respondent was in overall charge of the staff and the day to day collection made out of the sale of tickets, which was deposited in the company bank, namely, United Commercial Bank at Margao. The appellant was entrusted with the duty of taking the cash to the bank for the purpose of depositing and, thereafter, return the pass-book to the respondent showing the deposit. On 19-10-1993 the respondent was entrusted a sum of Rs. 9,067.35 with the bank pass-book for the purpose of depositing in the bank. When the appellant went to remit the money into the bank, two door-keepers also accompanied him as security. The appellant failed to return the pass-book till about 2.00 p.m. When the respondent inquired from him the appellant started to give evasive answers. The respondent then went to the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top