SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Bom) 682

H.W.DHABE, L.MANOHARAN
N. L. Abhyankar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - DHABE H.W., J.:—The petitioner claims that a writ in the nature of mandamus should be issued directing the respondents to compute and determine the Death-cum-Retirement-Gratuity (for short “D.C.R.G.”) payable to the petitioner as per the relevant rules applicable to him in that regard at the time of his retirement on 30-11-1969 and commands that the respondents should be directed to pay the said amount of D.C.R.G. forthwith with interest at the rate of 12% P.A. from date of his retirement till realization.

2. The facts are that the petitioner was appointed as a Judge of this Court on 6-10-1960 and was confirmed as puisne Judge on 6-10-1962. He retired as a Judge of this Court on 30-11-1969 after attaining the age of 62 years. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is not paid D.C.R.G. up-till-now although he is entitled to the same as per the relevant rules in that regard.

3. The conditions of service of the Judges of the High Court are regulated by the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 (for short “the Act”). In exercise of the powers conferred upon it under section 24 of the Act, the Central Government has framed rules as per its notification dated










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top