SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Bom) 256

V.S.SIRPURKAR, B.H.MARLAPALLE
Thapar Education Society & another – Appellant
Versus
Shyam Maroti Bhasarkars & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - SIRPURKAR V.S., J.:---These two petitions were disposed of on 10th June, 1997 and the orders impugned therein passed by the School Tribunal were set aside and the appeals filed by the respondent-teachers were directed to be dismissed. The order was declared in the open Court. Following are the reasons in support of the same.

2. Petitioner No. 1 in both the petitions is an Education Society registered under the Societies Registration Act and runs a school which is represented herein by the Head Master and is impleaded as petitioner No. 2. Respondent No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 3505 of 1993 is one Shyam Maroti Bhasarkar, a teacher working in petitioner No. 2/School at Ballarpur, District Chandrapur, while respondent No. 1 in Writ Petition No. 3508 of 1993 is one Shri P. K. Pandhare, also a teacher working in the same school. Since the controversy is common to both these teachers, both the petitions were heard simultaneously and were disposed of also.

3. Separate charge-sheets were filed against these two respondent/teachers by the management of the petitioner/School. As many as ten charges were levelled against both these teachers/respondents. Charges are practically common.














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top