SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 588

R.M.LODHA
Rajan Dinkarrao Pharate & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - LODHA R.M., J.:---Rule. Parties by Counsel. By consent, this batch of six writ petitions is heard finally at this stage.

2. Exclusion of more than 10,400 members out of total 10,687 members as voters for the election of Committee (Board of Directors) of Respondent Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited by the Collector, Satara vide its order dated 18-9-1996 is the core issue. In the counter to the core issue is the issue regarding the maintainability of these writ petitions.

3. Shriram Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited (for short, 'Shriram Karkhana') Respondent No. 8 in writ petition 4961/96 and Respondent No. 7 in other writ petitions is a specified society under section 73-G of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short 'Act of I960'). The said Shriram Karkhana has set up a sugar factory in Phaltan taluka, District Satara with crushing capacity of 2000 metric tonnes per day. It is also a processing society. The election to the Committee (Board of Directors) of Shriram Karkhana is required to be held by the Collector of Satara under section 73G and Chapter-XIA of the Co-operative Societies Act. The last election to the Board of Directors was held in the yea


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top