JUDGMENT - R.G. DESHPANDE, J.:---These two writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment, as they arise out of the judgment and decree, passed by the Extra Assistant Judge, Ahmednagar, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 378/81 dated 23rd December, 1983. To understand the facts of the present case, I would refer to the facts as are given in Writ Petition No. 307/91, since the facts being common.

2.Writ Petition No. 307/91, is filed by one Ramesh Sundar, who happened to be the respondent in another petition i.e. Writ Petition No. 3262/89. The present respondents in Writ Petition No. 307/91 are the landlords of the premises in question, who have filed Writ Petition No. 3262/89.

3.Smt. Sugrabai Mohd. Sadiq with her son, Mohd. Ramjan, who are respondents 1 and 2 respectively (in W.P. No. 307/91) are the landlords who filed Civil Suit for recovery of possession of the shop premises, admeasuring 15 x 10 ft. out of the ground floor area of the house i.e. City Survey Nos. 27 and 27-A, having Municipal House No. 2573, situated in Mochi Galli, Ahmednagar. The present petitioners i.e. petitioner No. 1-A to 1-G are the legal representatives of one Ramesh Sundar, who happened to be the ori

Click Here to Read the rest of this document