SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 565

N.D.VYAS, S.S.NIJJAR
Baburao Amrutrao Kharekar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - S.S. NIJJAR, J.:--In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the judgement and order passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Pune Region, Pune in Appeal No. 105 of 1988 dated 20th February, 1989. This appeal had been filed against the action of the respondents whereby the services of the petitioner were ordered to be terminated by an order dated 13th June, 1988. The petitioner has also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner on the post of Assistant Teacher with full back wages.

2.Briefly stated the facts leading to the filing of the present petition may be noticed.

3.The petitioner possesses the qualifications of B.Sc. and B.Ed. Therefore, he was eligible to be appointed on the post of Asstt. Teacher. The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Teacher in response to an advertisement in a newspaper. He was called for interview and was appointed as an Assistant Teacher by an order dated 27th June, 1985. This appointment was with effect from 1-7-1985 in a school managed by respondent No. 2. According to the petitioner, this appointment was against a clear and per



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top