SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 631

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(NAGPUR BENCH)
Desai A.A. Wahane B.U., JJ.
Harijan Layout Sudhar Samiti others .... Petitioners.
Versus
State of Maharashtra others .... Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 2013 of 1985, decided on 5-11-1996.
Advocates appeared :
S.G. Aney S. Sanyal, for petitioners.
Khade, A.G.P., for respondents Nos. 1 , 2, 4, 6 7.
S.K. Mishra , for respondent No. 3.
Anjan De, for respondent No. 8.

Headnote:Sections 37 and 31-Nagpur Improvement Trust Act (36 of 1936) of Section 46-Sanctioned plan-Amend by Development authority or State Government-Not possible for protection of basic feature-Declaration and making as Green belt Area-Conversion of green belt into housing purpose Illegal and quashed.-Whether an open space reserved for park. Garden or play ground for general public and as such shown as green belt in the developed sanctioned and published plain of the City of Nagpur could such piece of land be allotted to a private person or a Body of persons (in the instant case to the Society) far housing purposes.

       That the action of converting the green belt subsequently said to be open space for the housing purpose is wholly without authority of law and jurisdiction and, thereby the impugned orders are quashed and set aside.

       Section 51-See The Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936.

       Nagpur City and Corporation Act

       See The Nagpur Improvement Trust Act. 1936.

       The Nagpur Improvement Trust Act. 1936

       Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. 1966 and Nagpur City and Corporation Act and Environment (Protection) Act. 1986 -Space earmarked in the plan for open space meant for public parts. Green belt-Mandamus issued for bidding respondent from raising construction or otherwise using land for residential purpose Direction issued for undertaking the work for public purpose and preserve and protect environment by undertaking plantation.- The city of Nagpur is one of the crowded city where the residents do not get anything but atmosphere polluted by smoke and fumes emitted by endless vehicle traffics. In the instant case even the pollution is being caused by the Railway as the Railway Track Bombay-Nagpur-Delhi is just adjacent to the Kh. Nos. 37 and 38(1) besides this the pollution is being caused by Koradi Thermal Powers House. Hence, the importance of public parks plantation and creation places cannot be under estimated. The Public Park is a gift of modem civilisation and is a significant factor in the improvement of quality of life. In view of the provisions of the enactments referred to above also the respondents I to 3 cannot direct to convert the area which is earmarked as open space public park playground or recreation place for any other public purpose within the area envisaged the rein, unless grave compelling purpose of general public demand.

       Section 46-See Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Sections 37 and 31.

Judgment

WAHANE B.U., J.:—This writ petition is an apt example as to how the statutory object secure preservation of Environment and Development of the residential colonies shown in the Master Plan, sought to be achieved by the State of Maharashtra under the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936. The Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and the City of Nagpur Corporation Act, 1948, is defeated by the Authorities who lack of dynamism, aestheticism and enthusiasm for development and alienate the land/open space meant for Public utility.

2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners 1 and 3 being Societies and petitioner No. 2 a Corporator, thus, the public spirited citizens, have questioned the legality, propriety and justifiability of the impugned Resolution dated 13th June, 1980, (Annexure V, at page No. 58) and the impugned order of allotment dated 21st May, 1985 (Annexure XXIII, at page 116).

3. The Petitioner specified in para 2 of the Petition that the instant petition is in the interests of the citizens of Nagpur in general and residents of Jaripatka, Mecosabagh Sindhi Colony and Nazul Layout and Harijan Colony etc. in particular and thereby it is in the nature of a Public Interest Litigation. The petitioner No. 1-Harijan Layout Sudhar Samiti is a registered Society under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1860. The members of this Society are the residents of Nazul Layout, Harijan Colony, and of mouja Jaripatka, Tahsil and District Nagpur.

The Petitioner No. 2 is a Corporator elected from Ward No. 58 to the Corporation of the City of Nagpur. As such he represents the interest of the residents of Jaripatka which falls under Ward No. 58.

The Petitioner No. 3 is an unregistered association of citizens residing in the Sindhi Colony at Mecosabagh and as such they are also interested in the healthy planned growth of the North-East portion of Nagpur.

4. The erstwhile Government of Madhya Pradesh vide Survey and Settlement Memo No. 3327-3182/16-29 dated 23-9-1954 sanctioned a Layout know as "Nazul Layout" at mouja Jaripatka for providing residential land to the "Harijans" only. The sanction covered a total area of 21.47 acres including therein Khasra Nos. 37, 38/1, 38/2, 40/1 k. 40/2, 43/1, 47/1 and 57/1 of mouja Jaripatka, Tahsil District Nagpur. The plots of the Khasras referred above were auctioned by the Nazul Officer under the Respondent No. 4-Collector, Nagpur, to individuals, some of whom are the members of the Petitioner No. 1 Society. The Collector-the respondent No. 4 granted leases of some plots to the individuals. The auctioneers who purchased the plots and those who have been leased out by the Respondent No. 4-The Collector, constructed their houses thereon and are presently residing there. The petitioners specifically averred that the Kh. Nos. 37 and 38/1 were ever auctioned since these two pieces of land were kept for public utility and were shown as green belt in the master plan.

5. "The Harijan Layout" which included Kh. Nos. 37 and 38/1 was undeveloped by the Nagpur Municipal Committee-predecessor body to the Respondent No. 5-the Corporation of the City of Nagpur. Due to constant persuasion for taking steps for the development of the layout, finally the Respondent No. 3-Nagpur Improvement Trust passed a resolution sanctioning the expenditure for the development of the "Harijan Layout" comprising khasra numbers as stated above. Development was apprised to the Petitioner No. 1-Society by letter dated 30th December, 1974. Two Khasras i.e. 37 and 38/1 which were inducted in the green belt, were also included in this financial assistance for development.

6. According to the petitioners, besides the colonies referred earlier, the surrounding colonies are Christian Colony, Clerk Town, Indora, Juna Jaripatka, Kasturba Nagar, Western Coal Fields Ltd's Colony, New Income Tax College Complex, Reserve Bank Officers Quarters, Bezon Bagh, Lashkari Bagh etc., the population of which at

























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top