Per L. MANOHARAN, J. :---The petitioner was appointed as an assistant teacher on 26-6-1969 in the school belonging to the 1st respondent. He was later confirmed on 26-9-1971 and was promoted as Head Master with effect from 1-7-1973. While he was so working as Head Master, on certain allegations of misconduct his explanation was called for by the 2nd respondent and he submitted his explanation. As his explanation was found to be not satisfactory, the management decided to conduct an enquiry against the petitioner. Accordingly, a committee was constituted, as is required under Rule 36(2)(b) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 (hereinafter called as the Rules), to enquire into the allegations against the petitioner. The charges were duly framed and served on the petitioner. The petitioner filed his reply to the charges. The Committee found him guilty and decided to terminate his services and the management implemented the said decision by issuing Annexure-12 with effect from 1-9-1986. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner preferred Appeal No. 118/86 before the School Tribunal. The School Tribunal dismissed the appeal. In this writ petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document