SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Bom) 687

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Vishnu Sahai A.S.V. Moorthy, JJ.
The State of Maharashtra.... Appellant.
Versus
Savala Sagu Kokare another.... Respondents.
Criminal Appeal No. 243 of 1984, decided on 12-12-1996.
Advocates appeared :
Mrs. Jyoti S. Pawar, Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State of Maharashtra- appellant.
Rajeev Mohite with Mrs. Shirley Mazeralo, for the respondents.

Headnote:Section 156-FIR-In offence of rape on minor girl delay In lodging FIR ought to be ignored when it plausibly explained.

       Sections 215 and 464-0ffence under Section 379, IPC being a minor offence accused can be convicted there under even in absence of charge under Section 379. but under Section 392, IPC.

       Section 378-Appeal against acquittal-In rape case on minor girl when reasons assigned by trial Court for rejecting her testimony and acquitting accused are palpably and unerringly shaky. High Court can set aside acquittal.

       Section 376-Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Sections 378(1), 154-Evldence Act, 1872. Section 45-Rape-Testimony of evidence of prosecutrix-Held, evidence by circumstances, medical evidences allegations in FIR corroborated by evidence by prosecutrix-Inspires confidence in prosecution.

       Section 376-Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 59 and 134-Solitary evidence-If it can lead to conviction-Held, circumstantial and solitary evidence can lead to conviction.

JUDGEMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J. :---Aggrieved by a perverse Judgment dated 14-12-1983, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Sessions Case No. 75 of 1983, acquitting the respondents for offences punishable under sections 376 I.P.C. and 392 r/w 34 I.P.C. the appellant has preferred the present appeal, under section 378(1) Cr.P.C.

2.Briefly stated the prosecution case runs as under :-

The prosecutrix Chandrabhaga, P.W. 2 was the daughter of Zimaji Kokare. She was residing in village Deur, Taluka Javali, along with her parents, her brothers Anand and Shankar, her sister Lilabai and other family members. Her three brothers Shamu alias Shamrao, Vithal and Laxman, were residing at Maldev. Her elder sister Venubai and her husband Arjun were residing in village Kas. About a month prior to the incident, she along with Shankar had gone to her brother's place in Maldev. They stayed there till a day prior to the incident (3-2-83). On 3-2-83, on receiving news from father-in-law of her brother Shamrao about her brother's illness, she along with Shankar decided to return home. Her evidence is that her brother Shamrao had given her Rs. 1,500/- which she was to hand over to her parents for domestic expenses. Her evidence further is that at about 3 to 4 p.m. on 3-2-83 she and Shankar boarded boat of respondent-Zimaji in village Dinda. Till that place, her brother Laxman had accompanied them. At about 6 p.m. the same day, she and Shankar reached village Deur. As her house was at some distance, both of them decided to spend the night at the house of respondent-Savla. Respondent-Zimaji also decided to spend the night there. That night, after taking their dinner, at Savala's place, she and Shankar slept there.

On 4-2-1983, at about 7 a.m. the prosecutrix and Shankar started for their house which was at a distance of 2½ miles from respondent Savala's house. At about 8 a.m. while they were in the forest area, the respondent-Savala came from behind her and caught her around the waist. When she cried, he released her. After she had gone 20 paces, respondent Zimaji came out of the forest. At that point of time, her brother Shankar ran away in the direction of her house. Zimaji attempted to commit rape on her. She resisted. During her resistance, her underwear was torn. Thereafter, respondent Zimaji committed rape on her for about 15 minutes. The same resulted in bleeding from her private parts. When she was trying to get up, respondent-Savala threatened that he would kill her in case she got up. Thereafter Savala raped her for about 10 minutes. As a result of her being felled on the ground, the money which she was carrying, fell and the same was taken by the respondent-Zimaji. Thereafter, both the respondents told her that they would Kill her in case she informed anyone about what had happened. She then went towards her house and on the way, met her father Zimaji Kokare. She narrated to him the whole incident and also informed him the names of the respondents. At that time, her mother and brother Shankar were also accompanying her father. Thereafter, along with her father and others, she went home and changed her clothes. She handed over her blood-stained underwear to her father. The next day, (5-2-1983) her father along with her, went to village Kas where her sister Venubai and her husband Arjun were residing. It appears from her evidence that Arjun advised them to lodge an F.I.R. After spending the night at Venubai's place, next evening at about 9 p.m., she and her father came to Police Station.

3.The F.I.R. of the incident was lodged by the prosecutrix Chandrabhaga on 6-2-1983 at 9 p.m. at Police Station Medha. The said F.I.R. was recorded by Police Jamadar Vithal Shinde, P.W. 7. It is Exhibit 17. On its basis, a case under sections 376, 392, and 506/34 I.P.C. was registered against the respondents. After the F.I.R. had been lodged, Vithal Shinde sent her for medical examination to Civil Hospital, Satara.

4.The prosecutrix Chandrabhag















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top