JUDGMENT - R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.:---Heard the advocates for the parties. Admit. By consent, the revision application is taken up for hearing and final disposal.

2.By the present petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 16th August 1997 whereby the executing Court had allowed the application of the respondent for attachment of the two plots belonging to the petitioners for the recovery of money due to the respondent under Decree dated 20th July 1988 passed in Special Civil Suit No. 134/84/A. The records disclose that the respondent herein filed Special Civil Suit No. 134/84/A against one Madhukar Sagun Karpe for the recovery of money which was decreed by the said Decree dated 20th July 1988 and since the amount thereunder was not paid, the respondent herein filed the execution application. Meanwhile said Madhukar Karpe expired on 3rd August 1991 and, therefore, the execution application was filed against the petitioners who are the legal representatives of said Madhukar Karpe. Records also disclose that by Deed of Gift dated 20th April 1987 one Anandibai Raghunath Karpe had gifted two plots of her property situated at Sanquelim to the petitioners 1(b) and 1(c). By

Click Here to Read the rest of this document